首页 体育内容详情
皇冠体育官网app(www.hg108.vip):High Court rules Rewcastle-Brown's bid to challenge defamation charge premature

皇冠体育官网app(www.hg108.vip):High Court rules Rewcastle-Brown's bid to challenge defamation charge premature

分类:体育

网址:

SEO查询: 爱站网 站长工具

点击直达

皇冠体育官网appwww.hg108.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育官网代理APP下载、皇冠体育官网会员APP下载、皇冠体育官网线路APP下载、皇冠体育官网登录APP下载的皇冠体育官网平台。皇冠体育官网APP上最新登录线路、新2皇冠体育官网更新最快。皇冠体育官网APP开放皇冠体育官网会员注册、皇冠体育官网代理开户等业务。

High Court judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan says Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle-Brown's application to refer two questions of law to the Federal Court will only be considered if her case is transferred to the High Court. - The Malaysian Insight file pic, August 12, 2022.

THE High Court today ruled that it was premature to refer to the Federal Court to determine the constitutionality of a criminal defamation charge framed against Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle-Brown.

As such, judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan said, he decided not to consider the merit of Rewcastle-Brown’s application to refer two questions of law to the Federal Court.

He said Rewcastle-Brown’s application to transfer her case from the Kuala Terengganu Magistrate’s Court to the Kuala Lumpur High Court had to be heard and disposed of first.

Rewcastle-Brown could make the application to refer the two questions of law, if her case was transferred to the High Court, he said, adding that the court had not decided whether to allow her application to transfer the case. 

,

竞彩推荐www.99cx.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育网址代理APP下载、皇冠体育网址会员APP下载、皇冠体育网址线路APP下载、皇冠体育网址登录APP下载的官方平台。竞彩推荐上竞彩分析专家数据更新最快。竞彩推荐开放皇冠官方会员注册、皇冠官方代理开户等业务。

,

“In layman’s terms, the applicant’s application is still in transit. I am of the opinion that Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 would only apply if the proceedings concerned had been registered in the High Court,” he said

In September last year, Rewcastle-Brown was charged with criminal defamation at a Kuala Terengganu Magistrate’s Court over the publication of a book, The Sarawak Report: The Inside Story of the 1MDB Exposé.

She then applied to transfer the case from the Kuala Terengganu Magistrates Court to the Kuala Lumpur High Court, which was set for hearing on March 29, 2022.

However, the High Court fixed December 12 to hear the transfer application pending the hearing of Rewcastle-Brown’s request to refer the two questions of law to the Federal Court.

On Nov 21, 2018, Terengganu’s Sultanah Nur Zahirah filed a suit, naming Rewcastle-Brown, Gerakbudaya Enterprise publisher Chong Ton Sin and printing company Vinlin Press Sdn Bhd, as the first to third defendants, alleging that the first defendant made a disparaging statement about her in the book. – Bernama, August 12, 2022.


转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。

发布评论